<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OLPC versus Nintendo DS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polaine.com/2008/01/04/olpc-versus-nintendo-ds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/01/04/olpc-versus-nintendo-ds/</link>
	<description>Uncommon Sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:33:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Polaine</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/01/04/olpc-versus-nintendo-ds/comment-page-1/#comment-5479</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Polaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/2008/01/04/olpc-versus-nintendo-ds/#comment-5479</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, the OLPC has hit the market otherwise Stojanovic wouldn&#039;t be able to make the comparison. Whilst I&#039;m sure Nintendo have far greater resources than OLPC, I would imagine that they have not dissimilar cost and speed/specs issues.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The thrust of my post in response to Alexander&#039;s was about the way the OLPC was conceived rather than its most basic functionalities. There&#039;s no reason why the OLPC couldn&#039;t have a very different approach and interface - and I haven&#039;t had one in my hands myself so I can&#039;t confirm what Alex was saying.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;On the other hand I have been involved in education and interaction design projects that have really suffered from starting out from false premises, even with the best will in the world.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Don&#039;t get me wrong, I really want the OLPC to work wonders, but I&#039;m worried it&#039;s going to be another &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_C5&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sinclair C5&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the OLPC has hit the market otherwise Stojanovic wouldn&#8217;t be able to make the comparison. Whilst I&#8217;m sure Nintendo have far greater resources than OLPC, I would imagine that they have not dissimilar cost and speed/specs issues.</p>

<p>The thrust of my post in response to Alexander&#8217;s was about the way the OLPC was conceived rather than its most basic functionalities. There&#8217;s no reason why the OLPC couldn&#8217;t have a very different approach and interface &#8211; and I haven&#8217;t had one in my hands myself so I can&#8217;t confirm what Alex was saying.</p>

<p>On the other hand I have been involved in education and interaction design projects that have really suffered from starting out from false premises, even with the best will in the world.</p>

<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I really want the OLPC to work wonders, but I&#8217;m worried it&#8217;s going to be another <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sinclair_C5" rel="nofollow">Sinclair C5</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas.S</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/01/04/olpc-versus-nintendo-ds/comment-page-1/#comment-5478</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas.S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 22:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/2008/01/04/olpc-versus-nintendo-ds/#comment-5478</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe it&#039;s just that the nintendo has spent a long time on the market, has lots of software available? The OLPC has not even hit any market, and we look at its most basic functionalities?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s just that the nintendo has spent a long time on the market, has lots of software available? The OLPC has not even hit any market, and we look at its most basic functionalities?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Polaine</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/01/04/olpc-versus-nintendo-ds/comment-page-1/#comment-5472</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Polaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 07:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/2008/01/04/olpc-versus-nintendo-ds/#comment-5472</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yes I did read that. I got the feeling that was more to do with Intel wanting to do their own one than anything else.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I did read that. I got the feeling that was more to do with Intel wanting to do their own one than anything else.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim rudder</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/01/04/olpc-versus-nintendo-ds/comment-page-1/#comment-5451</link>
		<dc:creator>tim rudder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/2008/01/04/olpc-versus-nintendo-ds/#comment-5451</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;not sure &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7171201.stm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;if you saw&lt;/a&gt;..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7171201.stm" rel="nofollow">if you saw</a>..</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
