<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google isn&#8217;t making us dumb, but &#8216;smart&#8217; is changing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polaine.com/2008/06/17/google-isnt-making-us-dumb-but-smart-is-changing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/06/17/google-isnt-making-us-dumb-but-smart-is-changing/</link>
	<description>Uncommon Sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:40:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechieCrunch &#8211; Google myths that will amaze you</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/06/17/google-isnt-making-us-dumb-but-smart-is-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-9633</link>
		<dc:creator>TechieCrunch &#8211; Google myths that will amaze you</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 18:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/?p=793#comment-9633</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] is the smart solution to a technologically &#8220;dumb&#8221; and outdated library system [source: Polaine]. With Google, we can gather up-to-the-minute information from myriad sources with blazing [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is the smart solution to a technologically &#8220;dumb&#8221; and outdated library system [source: Polaine]. With Google, we can gather up-to-the-minute information from myriad sources with blazing [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhetorical Question? &#171; Wonderful Mistakes</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/06/17/google-isnt-making-us-dumb-but-smart-is-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-9594</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhetorical Question? &#171; Wonderful Mistakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/?p=793#comment-9594</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] is a lot of responses to this article because it got people to think for themselves which I love. Andy Polaine has a very different approach to this subject. He thinks the definition of smart is changing. Which [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a lot of responses to this article because it got people to think for themselves which I love. Andy Polaine has a very different approach to this subject. He thinks the definition of smart is changing. Which [...]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Polaine</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/06/17/google-isnt-making-us-dumb-but-smart-is-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-8133</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Polaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/?p=793#comment-8133</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hils - if you don&#039;t see the problem, that&#039;s a problem. The point isn&#039;t that database programmers aren&#039;t people, but that they are a very small minority of people. I know it reads odd (see the above comments).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Most people &lt;em&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/em&gt; think like database programmers – the underlying structure of databases is a mystery to most people and it&#039;s even a mystery to some programmers. People seeking information seek it in ways that make sense to their knowledge of the subject, not the way someone has decided to organise it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Amusingly, your comment ended up spam trapped because you got the reCaptcha wrong, proving that you are, indeed, a robot! Ha!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hils &#8211; if you don&#8217;t see the problem, that&#8217;s a problem. The point isn&#8217;t that database programmers aren&#8217;t people, but that they are a very small minority of people. I know it reads odd (see the above comments).</p>

<p>Most people <em>don&#8217;t</em> think like database programmers – the underlying structure of databases is a mystery to most people and it&#8217;s even a mystery to some programmers. People seeking information seek it in ways that make sense to their knowledge of the subject, not the way someone has decided to organise it.</p>

<p>Amusingly, your comment ended up spam trapped because you got the reCaptcha wrong, proving that you are, indeed, a robot! Ha!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hils</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/06/17/google-isnt-making-us-dumb-but-smart-is-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-8127</link>
		<dc:creator>Hils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/?p=793#comment-8127</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Emm, they are forced to think like database programmers.... I don&#039;t see the problem. After all programmers are people. Sorry but machines are not doing that themselves yet. Hopefully never will.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emm, they are forced to think like database programmers&#8230;. I don&#8217;t see the problem. After all programmers are people. Sorry but machines are not doing that themselves yet. Hopefully never will.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Polaine</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/06/17/google-isnt-making-us-dumb-but-smart-is-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-5852</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Polaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 06:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/?p=793#comment-5852</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You mean they&#039;re not robots? Seriously, though, that does read badly, I agree. It should really read &quot;think like a database&quot;, but that sounded weird.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean they&#8217;re not robots? Seriously, though, that does read badly, I agree. It should really read &#8220;think like a database&#8221;, but that sounded weird.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/06/17/google-isnt-making-us-dumb-but-smart-is-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-5850</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/?p=793#comment-5850</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;am i dumber because of your post? surely not and thanks for encouraging me to delicious even more (even though i do go back from time to time when i try to refer to something i saw on the web ages ago). the only slightly drastic passage i found to be &quot;force researchers to think like a database programmer, not like a person.&quot; 
i am sure even they are people too.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>am i dumber because of your post? surely not and thanks for encouraging me to delicious even more (even though i do go back from time to time when i try to refer to something i saw on the web ages ago). the only slightly drastic passage i found to be &#8220;force researchers to think like a database programmer, not like a person.&#8221; 
i am sure even they are people too.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Polaine</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/06/17/google-isnt-making-us-dumb-but-smart-is-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-5839</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Polaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/?p=793#comment-5839</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ha ha - I wondered if it might seem too long to stomach on the blogoweb or the old rss-o-feed. Interesting to see who bothers and who doesn&#039;t. I also spent an inordinate amount of time trying to make the first two paragraphs enticing enough for you skimmers to read further. Every blog post faces a first-page-of-a-book test. I suspect mine mostly fail.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha &#8211; I wondered if it might seem too long to stomach on the blogoweb or the old rss-o-feed. Interesting to see who bothers and who doesn&#8217;t. I also spent an inordinate amount of time trying to make the first two paragraphs enticing enough for you skimmers to read further. Every blog post faces a first-page-of-a-book test. I suspect mine mostly fail.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt D</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/06/17/google-isnt-making-us-dumb-but-smart-is-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-5838</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/?p=793#comment-5838</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ironically, I nearly skipped over this in my rss feeds because it seemed long and its late. Glad I didn&#039;t, top read.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, I nearly skipped over this in my rss feeds because it seemed long and its late. Glad I didn&#8217;t, top read.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asi</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2008/06/17/google-isnt-making-us-dumb-but-smart-is-changing/comment-page-1/#comment-5836</link>
		<dc:creator>Asi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/?p=793#comment-5836</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Top post my friend! absolutely fantastic. thanks for taking this further. it&#039;s a fascinating subject and my thoughts are too long and unstructured to properly comment now but will gather my thoughts and continue this joyful blogversation&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;best&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top post my friend! absolutely fantastic. thanks for taking this further. it&#8217;s a fascinating subject and my thoughts are too long and unstructured to properly comment now but will gather my thoughts and continue this joyful blogversation</p>

<p>best</p>

<p>A.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

