<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kinetic Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.polaine.com/2009/03/16/kinetic-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.polaine.com/2009/03/16/kinetic-design/</link>
	<description>Uncommon Sense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:40:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Polaine</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2009/03/16/kinetic-design/comment-page-1/#comment-8266</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Polaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/?p=1150#comment-8266</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Good old YouTube. Here&#039;s a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yT89o0kwZb8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;video of the Nakamichi&lt;/a&gt; in action.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good old YouTube. Here&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yT89o0kwZb8" rel="nofollow">video of the Nakamichi</a> in action.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Polaine</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2009/03/16/kinetic-design/comment-page-1/#comment-8265</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Polaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/?p=1150#comment-8265</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Sarah - Yes, I&#039;m always a bit skeptical about the choreography comparison too. Dan Saffer covers quite a few notation techniques form choreography but ends up saying that most of them are pretty experimental, often not terribly usable and that there is no real standard.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The DVD tray thing is amusing. I know lots of people that bought their CD or DVD player based on the eject mechanism. I interviewed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.priestmangoode.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Priestman&lt;/a&gt; a while back and we talked about this. He said that these &#039;feelings&#039; of quality don&#039;t have to be expensive at all and that the damper for that eject mechanism probably costs a couple of cents. It&#039;s really just inattentive design when those things are overlooked. I should fish out that interview and put it online actually - he is an interesting guy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Remember the &lt;a href=&quot;http://k-nisi.hp.infoseek.co.jp/rx-505.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nakamichi tapedeck&lt;/a&gt; that used to push the casette out and flip it over? I always wanted one of those. They still go for several hundred dollars on eBay.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sarah &#8211; Yes, I&#8217;m always a bit skeptical about the choreography comparison too. Dan Saffer covers quite a few notation techniques form choreography but ends up saying that most of them are pretty experimental, often not terribly usable and that there is no real standard.</p>

<p>The DVD tray thing is amusing. I know lots of people that bought their CD or DVD player based on the eject mechanism. I interviewed <a href="http://www.priestmangoode.com/" rel="nofollow">Paul Priestman</a> a while back and we talked about this. He said that these &#8216;feelings&#8217; of quality don&#8217;t have to be expensive at all and that the damper for that eject mechanism probably costs a couple of cents. It&#8217;s really just inattentive design when those things are overlooked. I should fish out that interview and put it online actually &#8211; he is an interesting guy.</p>

<p>Remember the <a href="http://k-nisi.hp.infoseek.co.jp/rx-505.htm" rel="nofollow">Nakamichi tapedeck</a> that used to push the casette out and flip it over? I always wanted one of those. They still go for several hundred dollars on eBay.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://www.polaine.com/2009/03/16/kinetic-design/comment-page-1/#comment-8264</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.polaine.com/playpen/?p=1150#comment-8264</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Nice post, Andy. I loved the article on Core77, I&#039;ve been thinking about it quite a bit since it was published.  I think all of these new areas opening up to design consideration area really exciting. I also really loved the comparison of the jukebox record-loading movement to the hinge on our dvd player as an example of how this aspect of design has been very overlooked in recent history. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One comment I have though, as a dancer (recreational, not professional), is that people always reference choreography as a practice that has a notation for movement. My experience is that this is not true - dance has the same documentation issues that we do as designers.  There are names for certain positions and movements, but writing them down in sequence does NOT convey choreography, and is usually far too cumbersome to be worth anything.  The choreographers I know sketch and document just like we should - with video.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post, Andy. I loved the article on Core77, I&#8217;ve been thinking about it quite a bit since it was published.  I think all of these new areas opening up to design consideration area really exciting. I also really loved the comparison of the jukebox record-loading movement to the hinge on our dvd player as an example of how this aspect of design has been very overlooked in recent history. </p>

<p>One comment I have though, as a dancer (recreational, not professional), is that people always reference choreography as a practice that has a notation for movement. My experience is that this is not true &#8211; dance has the same documentation issues that we do as designers.  There are names for certain positions and movements, but writing them down in sequence does NOT convey choreography, and is usually far too cumbersome to be worth anything.  The choreographers I know sketch and document just like we should &#8211; with video.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

