<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>taxi driver on Andy Polaine</title>
    <link>https://polaine.com/tags/taxi-driver/</link>
    <description>Recent content in taxi driver on Andy Polaine</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://polaine.com/tags/taxi-driver/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Taxi Driver With Storyboards</title>
      <link>https://polaine.com/2008/10/taxi-driver-with-storyboards/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 10:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
      
      <guid>https://polaine.com/2008/10/taxi-driver-with-storyboards/</guid>
      <description>There&amp;rsquo;s a discussion going on over at IxDA about whether an interaction design can create great interaction without great visual design skills.
My answer is &amp;ldquo;It depends&amp;rdquo;. The two are overlapping areas and whilst some interactions are really helped or hindered by the visuals, it&amp;rsquo;s also possible to have something almost entirely visually driven or entirely interaction driven. In service design, the designed interactions are often human-to-human and have no designed visual element at all.</description>
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
